资料图:美国众议院共和党领袖麦卡锡。中新社记者 沙晗汀摄
由于两党对立加剧、党派内斗、利益分配不均等因素,众议长选举陷入一场拉锯战。在此次众议长竞选中,美国民主党议员继续抱团,多轮投票中,一票不投麦卡锡,共和党右翼“强硬派”领头的约20人小团体也拒绝投票麦卡锡。
麦卡锡的当选之路一波三折,除了本人的“政治投机派”角色在国会不受欢迎外,与共和党内部政治分歧关系密切。
一方面,共和党党内反对者认为,麦卡锡对民主党态度过于软弱,无力对抗民主党控制的参议院和拜登政府,另一方面,因为共和党的多数优势微弱,党内一些影响力较小的派系的政治力量则被放大,有利于他们巩固自己的选票。
此外,党内反对者也认为,自己的选票没有换取更多利益,希望以此作为筹码换取麦卡锡更大的让步,比如让他们获得众议院重要委员会中的职务。
作为仅次于美国总统、副总统的政坛三号人物,众议院议长通常由众议院多数党领袖担任,选举几乎没有悬念。然而,麦卡锡此次为当选,不得不做出多个关键让步,其中可能包括恢复一项罢黜议长动议机制,使得众议长的权力被削弱,难以掌控众议院。
美国有线电视新闻网CNN称,麦卡锡在这场不合时宜的政治勒索中作出让步,这种绥靖政策只会让极端主义势力更加强大。
这场引发全世界围观的尴尬选举暴露出美国政治存在严重的对立和分化。在权力博弈思维的裹挟下,党派利益凌驾于国家和人民利益之上,美国两党相互拆台,陷入“为反对而反对”的无脑对垒。而即便是一党内,也会因为利益分配问题产生不同的小派系,相互对抗,选票变成了谋利益的工具。
从国会山骚乱到打破记历史记录的15轮众议长选举,“对抗式民主”让美国政治陷入瓶颈,长期对抗势必会让政客们丧失客观公正的判断能力,其政治阶层是否有能力治理国家也会引发质疑。
两党之争和党派内斗进一步放大了美国政治体制弊病,美国所谓的“民主”形象,让全世界大跌眼镜。鼓吹以选民利益为先的美式选举,变成了政客们利益置换的游戏,进一步彰显出美国“民主政治”日渐失能,不断极化的党争已使美国政治制度陷入死循环。
House speaker election reveals deep-rooted problems in U.S. democracy
(ECNS) -- The Republican leader Kevin McCarthy was elected as the 55th speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives after 15 ballots. As the most grueling House speaker election in the past 164 years, the election has highlighted the defects of the country’s "confrontational democracy".
The election once reached a stalemate due to intense partisan strife, inner-party struggle among the Republicans, uneven distribution of interests, and more. Democratic Party members forged a close alliance, refusing to vote for McCarthy, while about 20 Republicans also declined to cast ballots for the GOP leader.
Except for his unpopular role as a "political speculator" in Congress, McCarthy’s hard-won election can be attributed to turmoil within the Republican Party.
On the one hand, opponents in the Republican Party believe that the GOP leader's attitude toward the Democrats is too weak to confront the Senate controlled by Democrats and the Biden administration.
On the other hand, the political power of some less influential factions in the Republican Party has been amplified due to the Party’s weak majority advantage in the House of Representatives, which is conducive to consolidating their ticket warehouses.
Meanwhile, these opponents believe that their votes failed to win them more benefits, hoping to use this as a bargaining chip for McCarthy's further concessions, such as getting them positions in important House Committees.
As the third political figure after the President and Vice President of the U.S., the speaker, by tradition, is the head of the majority party in the House of Representatives.
But McCarthy has made many concessions in order to bring the ultra conservatives along, involving what’s known as the “motion to vacate,” a mechanism by which members can force a vote to depose the speaker. The reported concessions will empower individual members at the expense of McCarthy’s sway as speaker.
CNN thought the concessions he made during this unseemly political shakedown would only make the extremist faction more powerful.
This embarrassing election, which has drawn global attention, exposed the serious opposition and polarization in American politics. Both Democrats and Republicans put their interests before that of the country and its people, attacking and opposing each other irrationally.
Besides, different factions arise within a single party and confront each other because of the distribution of interests. Votes have become a tool to win more benefits.
From Capitol riots to the House Speaker election with record-breaking ballots, "confrontational democracy" has become a bottleneck of American politics. Long-term confrontation will surely impede politicians to think objectively and fairly while their capacity of governing the country will also raise doubts among the public.
Both parties’ struggle and infighting among the Republicans have further amplified the defects of the American political system, with its "democratic" image shocking the world.
The U.S.-style election, which advocates putting voters' interests first, has become a game of interest exchange among politicians. In addition, it further demonstrates the malfunction of American "democratic politics" and the constantly polarized party struggle that has trapped the American political system into an infinite cycle.
专访:中国在人道援助领域发挥着积极影响力——访红十字国际委员会总干事马尔迪尼******
新华社日内瓦2月3日电 专访:中国在人道援助领域发挥着积极影响力——访红十字国际委员会总干事马尔迪尼
新华社记者陈斌杰 玛蒂娜·福斯
红十字国际委员会总干事罗伯特·马尔迪尼日前在日内瓦接受新华社记者专访时表示,中国在人道主义援助领域发挥着积极影响力,红十字国际委员会希望与中国和中国红十字会进一步加深合作。
马尔迪尼说,中国关注人道主义事务,在全球多边舞台发挥着重要作用。中国倡导的理念与红十字国际委员会的工作方向高度契合。红十字国际委员会与中国红十字会日前在日内瓦签署合作备忘录,就双方未来五年的合作方向达成一致。
他表示,红十字国际委员会与中国政府机构、中国红十字会、智库以及学术界通过多种平台和机制,就全球公共卫生、人道主义卫生行动等问题一直保持着对话与合作。
根据1月27日签署的合作备忘录,红十字国际委员会和中国红十字会将加强在“一带一路”倡议人道领域的合作,促进人道外交,在国际人道法、卫生等领域开展合作,交流经验,并促进人道主义知识在青年中的普及。
马尔迪尼表示,中国在促进国际人道主义法、保护武装冲突中的平民等方面均有积极贡献。中国作为联合国安理会常任理事国,多次发声呼吁保护平民和尊重国际人道主义法。中国于2020年正式加入《武器贸易条约》,充分表明中国致力于维护国际和平与安全。
他指出,中国通过中非合作论坛这一机制,支持非洲国家的稳定与发展。中国和非洲承诺在气候变化、健康、和平与安全领域开展工作,这些重点领域也契合红十字国际委员会的人道优先事项。
马尔迪尼说,当前,全球面临多重危机,一些地区的人民饱受战乱、新冠疫情和气候变化等多重因素冲击,国际社会尚未给予足够关注。他呼吁国际社会在人道主义援助领域共同加大努力。
红十字国际委员会成立于1863年,总部位于瑞士日内瓦,旨在为受冲突和武装暴力影响的人提供援助,并积极推广保护战争受难者的法律。(新华网)
(文图:赵筱尘 巫邓炎)